PENDAMPINGAN OLIMPIADE MATEMATIKA: STRATEGI PENGUATAN PENALARAN SISWA DAN KOMPENSI GURU PEMBINA SMP NEGERI 3 RAMBAH HILIR

Authors

  • Lusi Eka Afri Universitas Pasir Pengaraian
  • Arcat Arcat Universitas Pasir Pengaraian
  • Zhafirah Najmi Universitas Pasir Pengaraian
  • Rika Yuliana Universitas Pasir Pengaraian

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52622/mejuajuajabdimas.v5i2.274

Keywords:

Learning Module, Mathematical Reasoning, Olympiad Mentoring, Teacher Coaching

Abstract

A systematic mentoring relevant to the demands of mathematics olympiads based on reasoning. The purpose of this activity is to enhance students’ reasoning abilities, develop a cotextualized olympiad learning module, and strengthen the competencies of teacher coaches. The implementation method uses a participatory-educative approach, actively engaging both students and teachers at every stage of the activities. The activities consisted of training, simulated, and competitive motivation sessions based role models. Evaluation was conducted throught pre test and post test, observation, and perception survey. The result show that there were an increase inthe average score of student’s reasoning by 52% and the accuracy rate of answers increases from 47,8% to 82,5%. This improvements were supported by mentoring strategy used, which includes habituation of a gradual approach, pattern identification, and the application of systematic critical thinking logic. Qualitative results futher indicated that 85% of student reported greather confidence and 90% benefited simulation question. The learning module proved effective in assisting teachers to improve their mentoring techniques and facilitating students’ understanding of the material. The growth of intrinsic motivation shows that 70% of student are motivated to participate in similar competitions in the future. These findings confirm that directed mentoring based on logical exercises and reflection is effective not only in improving student’s readiness to face olympiads but also has potential to bulid a culture of critical learning and independent coaching in schools.

References

M. Muzaini, M. Hasbi, and N. Nasrun, “The Role of Students’ Quantitative Reasoning in Solving Mathematical Problems Based on Cognitive Style,” Vygotsky, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 87, 2021, doi: 10.30736/voj.v3i2.380.

Devlin, The Mathematics of Love: Patterns, Proofs, and the Search for the Ultimate Equation. Dutton, 2011.

S. Herawati and P. Amelia, “Analysis of Student’S Mathematical Reasoning Ability in Solving Mathematical Problem Based on Hots,” Prima J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 1, 2021, doi: 10.31000/prima.v5i2.3661.

R. S. Nickerson, Critical thinking: A beginner’s guide. Routledge, 2015.

G. Polya, How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton University Press., 1945.

C. A. Anderson, Critical thinking and problem-solving: Applications in everyday life. Wiley, 2014.

L. E. Berk, Child Development. Pearson Education, 2019.

E. T. Priyatni and Martutik, “The Development of a Critical–Creative Reading Assessment Based on Problem Solving,” SAGE Open, vol. 10, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2158244020923350.

G. Thipatdee, N. Chaichana, and A. Kamsanor, “Teacher Development Through Coaching and Mentoring Integrated with the 21st Century Instructional Strategies,” vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 8–17, 2019, doi: 10.5539/ies.v12n11p8.

Lusi Eka Afri, Annajmi, Arcat, and Nurrahmawati, “Analisis Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Guru Matematika Pemula SMP di Kabupaten Rokan Hulu,” J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 112–119, 2023, doi: 10.33474/jpm.v9i2.20068.

S. G. Rivkin, E. A. Hanushek, and J. F. Kain, “Teachers,School,and Academic Achievement,” Econometrica, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 417–458, 2005.

S. Zakiyah, “Pengaruh Guru Terhadap Peningkatan Prestasi Akademik Siswa: Sebuah Tinjauan,” J. Holist. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 86–102, 2024.

S. Oktaviana, “1570-Article Text-3235-2-10-20241109,” Pendidik. Temat., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 305–312, 2024.

J. A. Phillips, M. C. McElwain, and K. W. Clemmer, “Metacognitive Training in Professional Development Can Improve and Sustain Student Achievement,” 2016, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.07856

M. R. Munthe, F. A. Monia, and M. Yesni, “Pentingnya Motivasi Belajar untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar,” J. Prosding Semin. Nas. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 289–290, 2023.

M. S. Khine, M. Al-Mutawah, and E. Afari, “Determinants of Affective Factors in Mathematics Achievement: Structural Equation Modeling Approach,” J. Stud. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 199, 2015, doi: 10.5296/jse.v5i2.7484.

Arif Zunaidi, Metodologi Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat: Pendekatan Praktis Untuk Memberdayakan Komunitas, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Putra Adi Dharma Redaksi, 2024.

B. Mikkelsen, Metode Penelitian Partisipatoris dan Upaya-Upaya Pemberdayaan: Sebuah Buku Pegangan Bagi Para Praktisi Lapangan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 1999.

S. M. Brookhart, How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD., 2010.

E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior,” Psychol. Inq., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 227–268, 2000, doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

How to Cite

Afri, L. E., Arcat, A., Najmi, Z. ., & Yuliana, R. . (2025). PENDAMPINGAN OLIMPIADE MATEMATIKA: STRATEGI PENGUATAN PENALARAN SISWA DAN KOMPENSI GURU PEMBINA SMP NEGERI 3 RAMBAH HILIR. Mejuajua: Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 5(2), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.52622/mejuajuajabdimas.v5i2.274